V.Stetsyuk's personal site logo
Mail to site
Print version
News (RSS)
The Scytho-Sarmatian Problems / Scythia: The Interpretation of the Data of Ancient Historians.

Scythia: The Interpretation of the Data of Ancient Historians.


Ancient historians had left us a wealth of material about the Scythians and Scythia, which however, cannot always be relied upon. Though this is no the fault of the historians but the consequence of the nascent state of historical scholarship and the result of the geographical imaginations of the historians caused by the absence of a reliable cartography. That only id the assertion of Herodotus that Scythia is an almost regular quadrilateral – which is quite impossible to place on the modern map.


His "History" has a very important feature – he himself points us to the degree of reliability of information, something defining it as a myth, something like reality. In some cases, the historian emphasizes: "they say so", in others – this does not express his opinion about the reliability of this or that information, sometimes he recognizes his ignorance (HASANOV ZAUR. 2002: 44-45).


When Herodotus submits the names of gods and men, geographical names or names of tribes and different realities of those times, it's a concrete material, which should be used skillfully. Unfortunately, too often, many scientists 'skillfully' used it in their own interest. Now, when we know the ethnic origin of the Scythians and their neighbors, this material may not only confirm the heuristic reasoning, but also enrich our understanding of that distant period.

We have already explained the names of Scythian gods (see Scythian Mythology), but Scythian place names may also have explanation by means of the Chuvash language. For example, the name of the area Exampaios (Eξαμπαiος) between the Borysthenes and Hypanis Rivers may correspond to Chuv. uksăm "wild garlic" and puy "to grow rich". The Panticapes River (Παντικαπης) can be explained as "mouldy" (Chuv păntăh "mould" and kap "look"). Some researchers identify Pantukapes with the Molochna (Milky) River, the left tributary of the lower Dnieper. The ancient and modern-day names of the river may have an identical explanation if the water in the river had (or has till now?) whitish painting which gives the reason to compare its color with milk or with mould. The name of the river Kypakyris (Yπαξυρις) can be translated as "chaff" or something similar (Chuv. kipek "peels" and irěš "bran"). The name of the Gerros River (Γερρος) can be connected with Chuv. kěre "a ford". According to Herodotus, the Gerros follows from the Dnieper to the sea and runs in the Kypakyris River near it. Obviously, ancient inhabitants of the Azov Sea coast named by the Gerros the waterway has been formed by low currents of the Samara River, the Vovcha, Mokri Yaly, and Kalchyk Rivers. The last runs in the Kalmius River near to its mouth. The Kalchik and Mokri Yaly come so nearer to each other in one place that, else at rather near historical times, the Zaporozh cossacks drew their boats from the one river in the another by land. This fact was described by G. de Bauplan (BAUPLAN de GUILLAME le VASSEUR, 1998) though he has wrongly named the Kalchyk as the Miuss River. Closely considering a modern topographical map, one can see that the isthmus, which separates the Mokri Yaly from the small tributary of the Kalchyk, has the distance not more than six kilometers, and both rivers could be connected with a channel so that to form a continuous way from the Sea of Azov up to the Dnieper (See Map 9). The map shows that a narrow valley leaves the river Mokri Yaly, it could be a small river in ancient times. Using this valley, it was possible to facilitate the work of hydraulic engineering, though increasing the length of the channel at the same time. Initially, this could just be a quagmire, which could be waded, and this explains the name of this whole waterway "Gerros" as a ford. Herodotus wrote that slaves dug a broad trench extending from the Tauric mountains to the Maiotian lake (the Sea of Azov), at a point where this is broadest. If the Tauric Mountains assume the Donets ridge, the trench would thus channel. Traces of this canal, in principle, can be found fairly easily, but now the isthmus railroad passes (see the map).

Incidentally, the name of Mokri Yaly River can mean "a waterway," because the Turkic languages have the word jol/joly "a way" and Ukr.mokri means “wet”. If we look for Turkic correspondence to the first part of the name, taking words with meaning "water", "wet", we suddenly come to the Kayala River known from the Ipatiev Chronicle. M. Vasmer and K. Menges argued that the correct form of the name is not Kayala but Kayaly (MENGES K.H., 1979: 100). K. Menges said about the explanation of the name of the river as qaj + jaly "a river with slippery banks", proposed by M. Sokol, but disputed it, because qaj is "just a verbal basis", while the second part of the word was borrowed by the "Southwest" Turkic languages from modern Greek γιαλοσ "a sea-shore, beach" (ibid., 102). This is not so, because the Gagauz and Turkish languages have a word qaj-ğy, where ğy - adjective suffix from the nominal basis (in other Turkic languages "slippery" – tajğy). If we take Turk. joly, turned into jaly in one of the "a-speaking" dialects, we get an explanation of the name of the Kayala River as "a slippery way". Semantically, it is close to the name of "wet way" if our assumption about the existence of wetlands between the Mokri Yaly and Kalchik is true. Especially if there had been drag-way on the wet areas.


Map 9. The river Gerros – the Waterway from the Dnieper to Azov Sea.



This topic is considered for more details in a separate article The Gerros – the Ancient Water Way from the Dnieper to the Sea of Azov


Thus the Gerros (Kayaly) was a water route from the Dnieper to the Sea of Azov, and then the Kypakyris can be identified with the Kalmius River. In this case it turns out that no the Mius River was mentioned by Herodotus, and the Kypakyris in accordance with his order of enumeration of the Scythian rivers would have to be west of the Gerros, not east, as follows from our arguments. Many scholars tried to put in order Herodotus’ muddled data, but so far no one was able. Obviously, we should recognize that they are true only partly. The Greek historian mentioned as the last the Tanais River which, obviously, is to be understood, as many have done before, the lower reaches of the Don and the Siversky Donets Rivers.

Herodotus and his informants knew nothing about the true Don, because if they would know it then they were certainly aware of the Volga, as they converge in this area very closely and this interesting fact could not be silent on. However Herodotus said nothing about any powerful waterway which could correspond to the Volga. This river was first mentioned in the 2nd cet. AD by Ptolemy called Ra (MAGIDOVICH I.P., MAGIDOVICH V.I., 1970: 26).

It is very difficult to establish ethnicity, and places of settlement of individual Scythian tribal groups on Herodotus' data. We have already mentioned that a sufficiently large number of Scythian names can be explained by means of the Old English. This could be considered an accident if it would not turned out that even more indecipherable Sarmatian and Alanian names of Abayev's Onomastikon have Old English interpretation. For a more detailed consideration of this matter, a list of names belonging to the Scythian-Sarmatian time and having a good interpretation by means of the Old English had been compiled on the basis of assembly of V. Petrov, V. Abayev, J. Harmatta, V. Latyshev, N. Knipovich and others. There are among these names many belonging to Alans, so the list became the code name "Alano-Anglo-Saxon Onomasticon".

The number of names which can be decrypted using the Old English language is very large although no doubt that some interpretation may be erroneous. This fact may be explained by the fact that the ancient Anglo-Saxons which moved to the left bank of the Dnieper and settled in the basins of the Desna and Seym Rivers remained here until the Scythian time and later moved to the Black Sea. At the same time, the southern and south-eastern boundary of the Urheimat of the Anglo-Saxons was held at the Teteriv River, which separated the ancient Anglo-Saxon settlements from the Thracians. Name of the city of Zhitomir, we explained as "a border protection" (OE scyttan "to shut, close", mer "a border") but OE scytta had also the sense "a shooter" and by sounding this word is close to the Greek name of the Scythians Σκυθαι. The Scythians were considered to be the best bow shooters and the ancient Greek ethnonym "a Scythian" was considered as the synonymous to the shooter. In this regard, we can assume that the Greek word for the Scythians may occur from the Old English word meaning "a shooter". Either way, the defensive line of Anglo-Saxons came from Zhitomir to the Dnieper and then continued along the Sula River. This line was made up by earth ramparts, which are still preserved till now and known as "Zmiywvi" (Serpent banks). As place names show, the part of the Anglo-Saxons moved to the left bank of the Dnieper, and there defended their territory by chain of hillforts along the right bank of the Sula River.



Serpent banks. According to a map of Wikipedia.


The neighborhood of the Anglo-Saxons and the Scythians may be confirmed by interpretation of some Scythian realities by means of Old English. For example, the name of the Scythian short sword akinakes (ακινακεσ), which is probably corresponded to Iranian kynk "a sword", is well explained “a killing ax” OE æces "an ax" and nǽcan "to kill". Another Scythian weapon, the battle ax sagaris (σαγαρισ) could also get the name from the Anglo-Saxons – OE sacu "a strife, war" and the earh "an arrow". The name of the Scythian clothing σακυνδακη was explained by V. Abayev as "the clothes from deer fur" (Os sag "a deer" and the tag/dag "a thread, woven fabric"), which is not entirely correct, as in this case the question is not the wool, but the skin. Too much deer would be need to collect their wool but the Scythians were not engaged in deer herding. Perhaps the second part of the word is OE đescan "to cover", akin to Lat. tŏga "a toga", tĕgĕre "to cover." The first part of a word can be translated as "Sakian", but also as "battle, war" (cf. OE sacu "a strife, war"). The name of the large boneless fish αντακαιοι has no convincing explanation. In accordance with the peculiarities of the fish, the prefix could mean "without, no”. Such words are present in Germanic languages (eg O.N.Gmc an/on). Then the root would have sense "a bone". Maybe Dt tak "a branch" and Ger Zacke "a spike" of unknown etymology can suit as their meaning is close to the sense "a bone". Then the third part of the word may be akin to Ger Hai “a shark," whose origin is hidden somewhere in North Germanic languages, but the proto-form of the word was supposed to be *kai. It is known that sharks are cartilaginous fishes, ie, boneless.

The possibility to decipher the names of the Scythian realities, as well as the names of some tribes by means of Old English seems strange if the Anglo-Saxons, not being Scythians, left a large trace in the Scythian vocabulary. It is appropriate to recall Herodotus’ words:


How many the Scythians are I was not able to ascertain precisely, but I heard various reports of the number: for reports say both that they are very many in number and also that they are few, at least as regards the true Scythians (HERODOTUS. 1993: IV, 81.)


Thus, sometimes Herodotus after his informants could call by Scythians also other peoples of the Northern Pontic country. The Anglo-Saxons can be connected with the Neuroi of Herodotus, if we assume that he listed the tribes in order from west to east.


Right: Scythia at Herodotus' time.


Red dots mark the defensive line of Anglo-Saxons, going from Zhitomir to the Dnieper and continued further along the Sula River. This boundary was composed of earthworks and hillforts that are particularly clearly visible along the right bank of the Sula.


Just the Neuroi stood as the second in the listing after the Thracians-Agathyrsians. Herodotus indicated that they left their homeland and settled among the Budinoi. OE neowe, niowe means "new". The nominalization of the word could give neower "a newcomer". The Anglo-Saxons could not call themselves newcomers, it is logically assume that such name them could give the local settlers, ie, the Anglo-Saxons, who came here formerly at the time of Trzciniec culture. This first wave of the Anglo-Saxons, judging by the place names and sites on the territory of East-Trzciniec on the Left Bank Ukraine, occupied basins of the Seym, the Low Desna, while the basins of the Sulla and Psel Rivers were settled by the Mordvins. Herodotus places Melanchlainoi to north of the Royal Scythians and explains their name as "dressed in black" (Gr. μελασ "black", χλαι̃να "outerwear"). However Melanchlainoi could be an Old English name, as ancient Angles had a proper name Mealling, originated from OE a-meallian "to get furious" (see HOLTHAUSEN F. 1974: 216), which together with OE hleonian "to protect" was used by the newcomers for calling their relatives. One might think that they were particularly militant.

The Budinoi are connected by many scientists with the ancestors of the Mordvins, and this assumption has some justification, but as it turned out, deciphering of the names of Budinoi by means of Old English confirms our assumption. Βουδινοι, perhaps even "Wudinoi", according to Herodotus, were the inhabitants of the forest country. In this case, OE widu, wudu "wood, forest", Eng wooden by the meaning and phonetically are suitable perfect. The word wuden was not found in the Old English but it could exist and be an adjective von "forest" on the laws of English grammar.


Left: Bilsk hillfort.


Herodotus located the city of Gelonos in Budinoi country. Scientists did not come to consensus about its real place. B.Shramko long argued that the city has to be connected with Bilsk hillfort on the Vorskla River (SHRAMKO B.P. 1987), but V. Il'inski refuted this hypothesis. (IL'INSKAYA V.A. 1977: 91-92). Certainly Shramko is right. Bilsk hillfort has large dimensions – the total length of ramparts is 33 833 m, their height is now 6 m and width – up to 9 m (SHRAMKO B.P. 1987: 25).

A Mordvinic epos about building a great city (MASKAYEV A.I. 1965: 298) confirms Shramko's idea. In addition, Mordvinic place names in the basin of the left tributaries of the Dnieper say to its favor (see. Section "Finno-Ugric Place Names of Ancient Times"). Judging by the toponymy, Mordvinic tribes had to hold the territory of the left bank of the Sula River and basin of the Psel and Vorskla Rivers, ie north-western part of the area of Bondarykha culture. This culture, which existed in the interval 1200 – 800 years BC, is associated with its predecessor Maryanivka sites which occur on the Desna, Seym, Sula, Vorskla, Sev. Donets and Oskol Rivers (BEREZANSKAYA S.S. 1982: 41). Bondarykha culture goes beyond the border of Maryanivka culture in the area between the Seym and Sula Rivers. Lebediv culture created by the Anglo-Saxons was spread just here later. Crossing the Dnieper River Saxons pushed Mordvins beyond the Sula River, and maybe also have assimilated their remnants, which is reflected in the otherwise unexplained lexical correspondences between the English and Mordvinic languages. Crossing Dnieper Anglo-Saxons forced out Mordvins beyond the Sula and maybe assimilated their rests what was reflected in lexical matches between the English and Mordviniń languages (see. Section "The Expansion of the Finno-Ugric Peoples").


Left: Map of Bils'k hillfort (Gelonos) according B. Shramko (SHRAMKO B.P. 1987: 24, Fig. 2.)


Number mark
1. Western fortification.
2. Eastern fortification.
3. Kuzemyn fortification.
Oriental ramparts run along steep banks of the Vorskla River, and Western ones- along the dry bed of the Sukha Hrunl River.


The Alazonians may be considered as the ancestors of the modern-day Kurds. The analysis of the place names in the Western Ukraine has shown that the cluster of names, decrypted by means of the Kurdish language, lies precisely in those places where Larissa Krushelnytska researched one of the variants of the Chornolis culture (KRUSHELNITSKA L.˛., 1998) and where Herodotus placed the Alazonians above the the Callipidai, ie where the Tiras (Dniester) and Hypanis (Southern Bug) approach one another (HERODOTUS, IV, 52). Interpretation of the ethnonym "Alazonians" (Αλαζονεσ) is difficult. It can be translated as "born in a shirt" (OE hāla "the afterbirth, placenta", sunu "a son"), another option could also be "colored (red?) people" at Chuv ula (in other Turkic languages ala) "colorful" and çyn "a man". The consonance of the names of Alazons and Amazons attracts attention. The latter can be explained using Chuv. amă “a female, mother” and çyn "a person, man" what allows to explain both names using the means of the Chuvash language. A seductive version of the origin of the ethnonym from PGm aliza "alder", with which it is possible to relate the name of the country Oleshia in the lower reaches of the Dnieper (SHAPOSHNIKOV ALEKSANDR KONSTANTINIVICH. 2007: 44) should be discarded by several reasons. First, Herodotus wrote about the Alazones, not Alizones, and secondly, it is possible to speak confidently about the presence of this restored root in the name of alder only in the Celtic and Slavic languages, but neither the Celts nor the Slavs were in these places at Scythian time. And, finally, the Alazons lived quite far from Oleshia.

Identification of Androthags is impossible. Herodotus' information is too skimpy and contradictory. So far, we assume that it is a common name of different peoples staying on low level of development, as evidenced their name translating is "man-eaters".

Here are a few proper names and names of tribes mentioned by Herodotus which can be explained by means of the Old English laguag:

Αγαθιρσ (agathirs), Αγαθιρσοι (agatirsoi) – according to Herodotus Agathyrsos was a son of Heracles and gave rise to the tribe of the Agathyrsians – OE đyrs (thyrs) "a giant demon, a magician" is well suited for both the name and the ethnonym. For the first part of the name, we find OE ege "fear, terror", and the whole means "terrible giants or demons". However, OE āga "owner", āgan "to have, take, receive, possess" suite phonetically better. Then the ethnonym can be understood as "having giants". Below, we decipher the ethnonym the Thyssagetai (see Θυσσαγεται) as a nation of giants in the north of Scythia. Thus, we can suppose that the Agathyrsians subdued the Thyssagetai

Αναχαρσισ (anaxarsis), the Scythian famous traveller and sage – Anacharsis was not a Scythian. It can be concluded from the Herodotus' phrase: "Now the region of the Euxine upon which Dareios was preparing to march has, apart from the Scythian race, the most ignorant nations within it of all lands: for we can neither put forward any nation of those who dwell within the region of Pontus as eminent in ability, nor do we know of any man of learning having arisen there, apart from the Scythian nation and Anacharsis". (HERODOTUS, IV, 46 ). Anacharsis was the son of Gnuros, the son of Lycos, the son of Spargapeithes (see Σπαργαπειθησ). All three last names can be decrypted by means of Old English. Then, an Old English match must also be found for the name Anacharsis: Old Saxon. āno "without", OE hors/hyrs "horse" (ie, "Horseless").

Αριαπειθεσ (ariapeithes), the name of a Scythian king – OE ār „honor, dignity, glory” (ārian "to honor"), fǽtan „to decorate” (“adorned with glory”). The ruler of the Agathyrsians Spargapeites lived at the same time (see Σπαργαπειθησ). He killed Ariapeithes.

Γνυροσ (gnuros), the son of Lykos, the father of Anacharsis – as Shaposhnikov asserts, the name has no features as of Indo-Iranian and Eastern-Iranian origin (SHAPOSHNIKOV A.K. 2005, 39), but cf. OE gnyrran "to grind". Akin Germanic words mean "to roar, growl." These senses do not seem suitable for a name, but derived nouns from these verbs could be the name of a beast. Ukrainian, Belorussian, Russian, Polish words knur, knur mean "a male pig". Moreover, in the same languages, as well as in Slovak and Lusatian, there are words close to the Greek form of the word (Ukr., Rus. knoroz, Blr. knorez, Slk. kurnaz, Pol. kiernoz, Up.-Lus. kundroz – all "male pig"). In the etymological dictionaries of the Ukrainian and Russian languages, explanations of the origin of all these words are considered unsatisfactory, not quite clear or onomatopoeic (A. VASMER MAX. 1967: 264-265 and A. MELNYCHUK O.S., Ed. 1985: 474) as a corresponding root is absent in the Slavic languages. It can be assumed that in Old English there was the word gnyr "boar, wild boar" and it was borrowed by the Slavs in this sense. Thus, the name of the king's grandson could mean "wild boar". Cf. Θυσκεσ. How the Slavic languages have got also the Greek form of the word, it is necessary to find out, because such word is absent in the Greek language. Perhaps, in the language of the Greeks who inhabited Ukraine in Scythian times, it existed, being borrowed from the neighboring Anglo-Saxons.

Θυσσαγεται (thussagetai), the Thyssagetai, one of the folks in Northern Scythia mentioned by Herodotus, or Thyrsagetae (by Valery Flaccus) – The presence of the morpheme getai/ketai (Μασσαγεται, Ματυκεται, Μυργεται) in the names of several tribes is noteworthy . In addition, the Thracian tribes Getae (Γεαται) are known in history. We can suppose that this word means "people". The closest to it is the Chuv kĕtỹ "a flock, herd". Then Thyssagetai were "unruly people" (OE đyssa "rowdy”). If the form of Valery Flaccus is more correct, as it is likely, since it echoes the name of the Agathyrsians. (see Αγαθιρσ, Αγαθιρσοι), then the Thyrsagetae means "the people of giants and wizards" (O. Eng đyrs "a giant, demon, wizard").

Λικοσ (likos), the son of Spargapeithes – OE. līc „body” could be the name of a man of large buil.

Οδατισ (odatis), after the story of Chares of Mytilene (Χάρης ὁ Μυτιληναῖος, the 4rd cent. BC) the only daughter of the Scythian king Omart (see. Ομαρτησ) – Chuv. atte "of the father", těs "kin, appearance, face".

Ομαρτησ (omartes), a Scythian king, the father of Odatis (see. Οδατισ) – Chuv. ămărt "eagle".

Παντικαπηιοσ, (pantikape:ios), Panticapaeum, a Greek city on the shore of the Kerch Strait, the Panticapes River is a common explanation for the name of the colony "fishing way" (Afg., Yazg. pand, Shugn. půnd, Saryk. pond, Os. fändag "way", Afg. kab, Os. käf "fish"). But the name is clearly of Greek origin [cf. Gr. ποτοσ «sea» and καπη "dam" [(at Frisk Ger. Krippe 1. "manger", 2. "dam")]. The name of the Panticapes River has also another explanation (see above).

Σκοπασισ (skopasis), Scythian military commander during the war with the Persians – perhaps the word is derived from OE scop "a poet, singer." OE ease "cup" can be offered for the second part of the word. However, the Greek sculptor Skopas was known (Gr σχοψ "an owl").

Σπαργαπειθησ (spargapeithes), the name of two men, one of them was the Agathyrsian king, another was the king of the Scythians – the name can be translated as "a hewing sparks" by means OE spearca “a spark" and restored word *pathan “to beat". Restoring followed such way. Old English had the word pađ “a path” bur it is known that the words path, road are often attributed as "beaten". Farther, OE pýtan had one meaning "to squeeze, push". In addition, Herodotus translated Oyor-pata as "a killing men". Obviously, the Turkic word pata- “to beat” was borrowed by Old English and lost later. It should not embarrass that the names of Agathyrsian and Scythians kings had German origins. The fact of the transition of royal names from one nation to another is known (ARTAMONOW M.I., 1974: 131).

If we assume presence of the Anglo-Saxons on the territory of Ukraine in the Scythian time, then they should be identified with a certain tribe, known to us from later historical sources. Explanation of some names Alan leaders using Old English suggests that this tribe could be a tribe of Alans (Αλανοι). This issue is discussed in the article "Anglo-Saxons on the Ukraine"

In other cases, we can talk about the Baltic, Finno-Ugric and Turkic tribes, but assumptions can be very different. For example, the name Irycai, (Ἰύρκαι) may hide Ugric ancestors of modern Hungarians, Khanty and Mansi peoples, as well as Turks or even a tribe disappeared over time.

If we talk about the one-eyed Arimaspians, we can assume that this is not pure fantasy of the informants of Herodotus as this name may hid Turkic word jarym "half" which together with some, yet undiscovered word means simply "a half-seeing" or even better "half-open eyes". In the latter case, this people could be of Mongoloid appearance. Obviously, these people dwelled beyond the Volga. With the help of the Turkic languages, you can decipher the name of Issedonians as "people in warm clothes” (Turkic issi/yssy "warm" and don "clothes ").

Herodotus wrote that the Callipidai were Hellenic Scythians. We have no sure prerequisites to identify them with any historical ethnic group. Maybe they spoke special dialect of Greek, badly understood by true Hellenes. In this case, the Callipidai may be the descendants of those Proto-Greeks which remained in the Ukraine after the bulk of them went to the Peloponnese. Summing up our discussion of the ethnic composition of Eastern Europe since the end of the 2nd and during the first half of the 1st millennium BC, we submit a map of migration of the population in this period of time (see the map below).


Map 10. The directions of the migrations of ethnic groups in Eastern Europe in the end ˛˛-ăî – the beginning ˛ mill. BC.


Moving to the east and south-east, the Bulgar during the 1st mill BC gradually settled the steppe part of the left banks of the Dnieper/ Here they entered in a long and close contact with the Magyars, as evidenced by the numerous lexical matches of the Chuvash and Hungarian languages. Staying in Pontic steppes a few centuries, the Bulgars have created a culture of a high level which is known as the Scythian. They established and maintained contacts with the agricultural centers of Asia Minor and the Balkans but created own culture on a local basis. Herodotus identified as the parts of the whole Scythian community four distinct groups – the Scythians-farmers, the Scythians-plowmen, the Nomadic Scythians, and the Royal Scythians. In historic times we know already two ethnic communities, which we relate to the Ancient Bulgar – the actually Bulgar and Khazar. The Khazars had semi-nomadic and semi-agricultural economy but the Bulgar were nomads (PLETNIOVA S.A., 1986: 8-21). It is difficult to judge how agricultural tribes under the influence of natural conditions may shift from farming to nomadic economy, so the identification of four Scythian tribes of Herodotus with later Bulgarish tribes is difficult.

Since the beginning of the III. BC. sites of the Scythian steppe culture are absent, a testament to its decline or even ruin (SIMONENKO O.V. 1994, 32). Some scientists see the reason for this in invasion of the Sarmatians and refer to Diodorus Siculus, accordin whom the Sarmatians, caming from the Don country, devastated much part of Scythia and established their rule over it. Archaeological findings evidence in favor of this invasion which was resulted in loss of dominant position of "Royal Scythians", described by Herodotus, at the beginning of the IV century BC (SULIMIRSKIY T. 2008 – in RussianChanges in the ancient Scythians). Retreating from the Sarmatians, the Scythians had left vast areas of Azov coast, although a deal of them stayed on the banks of the Lower Dnieper, "where a half dozen settlements was arisen such as Zolota Balka, Znamenka, Liubymivka but others moved to the Crimea, where they formed a Scythian Kingdom, or Scythia Minor with its capital in Naples” (BARAN V.D., 1985: 5). However, other experts say that Diodorus events are not dated and generally he wrote about Sauromatians, not Sarmatians, and believe that the Sarmatians appeared in the Northern Black Sea until the end of the II millennium BC. (SIMONENKO O.V. 1994, 34). Accordingly, there is doubt that the Sarmatians have been responsible for the decline of the "Great Scythia":


Final Great Scythia and resettlement of the Sarmatians to the northern Black Sea are separated by a century gap, which does not allow connecting these two events (POLIN S.V., SIMONENKO A.V. 2004: 372).


It is still difficult to talk about the ethnic composition of the population of the Northern Black Sea region at the time when the Goths came here. Maybe they didn’t find the Scythians, but reveal their traces in place names. Iordanes, in his "Getica" rather scanty described the coming of the Goths for new place of settlement, but it does have such evidence:


But when the volume of the people increased greatly and Filimer, son of Gadaric, reigned as king -about the fifth since Berig – he decided that the army of the Goths with their families should move from that region. In search of suitable homes and pleasant places they came to the land of Scythia, called Oium in that tongue (JORDANES. 1960: 25).


Namely by which language was named the land, it is not clear from the context – Scythian or Gothic. Jordanes commentators believe that Oium is a Germanic word (supposedly Gothic *ajum akin to Ger Aue "valley, meadow" existed in the Gothic language). If we turn to the Chuvash language, we find the word uçam "area, place", which has matches in other Turkic languages (Turkm., Kirghiz., Yakut. orun, Tat. uryn, Kaz. oryn, etc.) Complex transformation Turkic rjç corresponds to the phonological patterns of the Chuvash language (cf. Chuv ura "a foot" – Turk. ajak "a foot", Chuv çĕr "hundred" – Turk juz "hundred"). The Goths just could borrow the Bulgarish word for the name of this land. But even if it has Germanic origin, it does not change anything, because the very existence of this word in the Chuvash language speaks of Gothic-Bulgarish language contact in the 2nd cent AD in the Northern Black Sea coast. Jordan was also confirmed this:


Farther away and above the Black Sea are the abodes of the Bulgar, well known from the wrongs done to them by reason of our sins (Ibid: 37).


Judging from the context, the area Oium was on the Left Bank of the Dnieper. In later sources, the Goths, as well as Bulgarians, often referred as the Scythians by the name of the country they inhabited:


Das Reich der Skythen, die einst Herodot beschrieben hat, war länger aus den Steppen am Nordufer des Schwarzen Meers verschwunden. Dennoch betrachteten die Bizantiener noch ein Jahrtausend nach dem Klassiker der Geographie die Bewohner der Länder jenseits des „Pontos Euxines“ als Skyten (POHL WALTER. 2002: 22)
(Translation: Scythian Empire, which was once described by Herodotus, has long vanished from the steppes of northern Black Sea coast. However, the Byzantines called residents on the other side of „Pontos Euxines“ as the Scythians for a thousand years after the classics of geography).





   

Please this page? Help us to develop this site!

© 1978 – 2018 V.Stetsyuk

Reprinting of articles from site are encouraged while
reference (hyperlink) to my site is provided

Site powered by

Load count : 6953

Modified : 10.12.2018

If you look up the type error
on this page, please select it
by mouse and press Ctrl+Enter.