V.Stetsyuk's personal site logo
Mail to site
Print version
News (RSS)
Ethnogenic Processes at the Iron Age. / The Expansion of the Finno-Ugric Peoples

The Expansion of the Finno-Ugric Peoples

The ancestors of the Finno-Ugric peoples, coming from the Caucasus, were settled over a wide area of Eastern Europe, where in ethno-producing areas between the Volga and Don Rivers where were arisen primary dialects from which later developed the modern Finno-Ugric languages.

At left: The map of Finno-Ugric habitats in Central Russia

When comparing the location of the individual areas of ancient Finno-Ugric ethnic communities defined previously with habitats of their descendants, it can be clearly seen that ekspansion of the Finno-Ugric peoples has been directed mainly to northward and northeastward and covered a very wide area.

In general, the Finno-Ugric peoples migrated to the territory of the so-called speakers of the Uralic languages. Their resettlement beyond the Volga River began since Neolithic times, and led to the formation of the group of the Samoyed languages on the space, to determine which boundaries we have no sufficient data.

Harsh natural conditions prevent to rapid population growth of this large area, so large uninhabited tracts remained here for a long time and attracted new settlers. At the same time, the remoteness of the Finno-Ugric settlements from the centers of agrarian civilization and the natural conditions didnt conduce to borrowing useful crops and technologies, and to developing agriculture in general. Fishing and hunting dominated by in an economy, and such way of economic development require large territories.

Studying ethnic processes in the antiquity, V.Gening, referring to V.O. Dolgih's data, states that 36 thousand of Tungus hunters migrated in Eastern Siberia on huge spaces in the 18th century but at the same time the horse breeder and cattlemen Yakuts in number of 28 thousand occupied the 20-30 times smaller territory in the relic forest-steppe zone (GENING V.F., 1982: 103). The number of the inhabitants of some area is limited by the volume of subsistence can be delivered by it. The hunting and the fishing being the basis of production even for small clans required the large spaces. Therefore, if favorable conditions promoted the growth of the population in some habitat, the relative overpopulation was arising, and the way out of this situation was the transition of a part of this excess population to new places (BRIUSOV A.Ya., 1952: 10). Having studied the life of the Northern-American Indians, L.Morgan describes the process of their settling insomuch:

The method was simple. In the first place there would occur a gradual outflow of people from some overstocked geographical centre, which possessed superior advantages in the means of subsistence. Continued from year to year, a considerable population would thus be developed at a distance from the original seat of the tribe. In course of time the emigrants would become distinct in interests, strangers in feeling, and last of all, divergent in speech. Separation and independence would follow, although their territories were contiguous. A new tribe was thus created (MORGAN LEWIS H., 2000: 104).

Such process of settling is named as the segmentation. And, as Bryusov believed, quite often it covered the large space, and migrants kept away often on significant distance from the primary place of their settlements. Waterways which defined directions of population shifts were usually used (BRIUSOV A.Ya. 1952, 10).

The resettlement of the Finno-Ugric peoples had begun when their individual languages have already developed distinctive features due staying for a long time each in its own ethno-producing area. Obviously, it started under the pressure of the Turkic tribes which migrated from their ancestral home in different directions from the beginning of the III mill. BC. (see the map at right). The migration of Turkic and Finno-Ugric peoples is well connected chronologically:

Tribes of typical the PitComb Ware which appear in Eastern Baltic during the second half of the III mill. BC are regarded in modern archaeological literature as the earliest ancestors of the Baltic Finns (DENISOVA R.Ya. 1974: 29)

Sure enough, it can be assumed that the ancestors of the Chuvash Bulgars, the creators of Fatyanovo option of Corded Ware culture, forced to resettlement Finnish tribes of the extreme western and north-western areas. Having advanced along the Desna River to the Upper Volga basin, they occupied the land Vepsians and Estonians. As the place names shows, the Vepsians, the most western Finnish ethnos not immediately moved to their present places of residence, but settled in the neighboring lands close to their ancestral homeland. Moving westward was prevented for the Vepsians by Baltic tribes, which have expanded their territory to the east, and the Estonians, who immediately began to move to the Baltic Sea, prevented them to move north. Eventually Vepsians moved after Finns and now inhabit the area east and south of the Estonians and Finns.

Further movement of the Bulgars along the Volga and Klyazma Rivers forced to migration also the Lapps (Sami), which occupied the northernmost area on the primary Finno-Ugric territory. They moved ahead of all in a northerly direction and eventually occupied the northernmost region of Europe in Scandinavia and on the Kola Peninsula. It must have happened about 700 BC, what follows from the arguments of Hans Fromm (FROMM HANS, 1990, 16). Overcoming this lasted at least several centuries.

At left: The Baltic-Finnish and Sami toponymy of the North Russia on the map of A.K. Matveev (MATVEYEV A.K. 1969: 46.)
1 the Baltic-Finnic names; 2 Sami names.

In accordance with the location of their historical ancestral home, the Finns had to move behind the Lapps and thus had to be west of the Estonians, what is just why their way lay towards the White Sea. Mapping showed that the Baltic Finns and Lapps occupied the north-western half of the Russian North (see map on the left). The Baltic-Finns are considered as the Finnish-Suomi and the northern Karelians. In the future, the Finns followed the Lapps along the western shores of the White Sea to the places of their present habitat. The map also shows Veps toponyms, but Veps took up this territory later.

In accordance with the location of their historical ancestral home, the Finns had to move behind the Lapps and thus had to be west of the Estonians, what is just why their way lay towards the White Sea

The Proto-Khanty (Ostyaks) and Proto-Mansi (Voguls) occupied the extreme east of Finno-Ugric territory. Therefore they have begun movement eastward as the first. Proto-Mansi having been their habitat north of the area of Proto-Khantys, moved to their modern residence by the northern way. There are data about 1096 in the Old Russian Chronicle that some Ugric clan was being settled in the region of the river Pechora. This clan or tribe may be considered as the Mansi. Max Vasmer writes the traces of the ancient Mansi are available at the Upper Pechora and the Izhma river still 1396 (VASMER MAX., 1964-1974, V.1: 330). In addition, there are in Udmurtia villages of Igra, Upper Igra, Old Igra. The word igra is like the chronicle name of Mansi yugra, which has matches in Udmurt and Komi. Another indication of Mansi stay in the north of the European part of Russia may be Mans vaps "son in-law". If the Mansi and Veps were neighbours sometimes, Veps could be a son n-low of Mansi. Therefore, we can assume that the Voguls (Mansi) came to the upper Ob river recently by passing Ural Mountains in the most accessible place. The Komi tribes moved after the Voguls, the Votyaks. followed tjem. Without a doubt, the migration of the eastern group of the Finno-Ugric peoples should be associated with the spread of the Abashevo culture across the Volga from the basin of the Sura and Sviyaga rivers. Because this culture existed in the middle of the 2nd millennium BC, the beginning of the expansion of the Finno-Ugric peoples to the north-east and east should be referred to this time.

Hypothetical migration pattern of the Finno-Ugric tribes

It sketched outline pattern can be added by other logical considerations. Movement of Mordvinic tribes can be restored according the separation of the originally only language into two dialects, currently considered to be separate languages. Obviously, the ancestors of Moksha-Mordvins were remaining in place during some time, and only later moved westwars and south-westward, while the ancestors Erzya-Mordvins moved eastward and north-eastward beyond ther Cheremisses and Votyaks. Staying at the bank of the Volga, they occupied the territory of present Nizhny Novgorod region and Chuvashia, as this is evidenced by local place names. The Erzias traces are particularly clear expressed in the Nizhny Novgorod region, not to mention about the Mordovia. Mordvinic toponymy layer is here so dense that the coverage of this issue is a particular topic. Here are just a few examples. The name of the town of Arzamas, obviously, comes from the ethnonym Erzya, but that means the second part of the word it is not clear. The town of Kstovo was certainly evolved in the old settlement of Strawberry Fields, receiving the name of Erzya kstyi Moksha ksty "strawberry" (the suffix -vo, obviously, has Slavic origin). Erzya ley "river" is present in the name of the river Shemley, lt of the Ozerka, rt of the Kudma, rt of the Volga. This element is found in many place names as in hydronyms and oikonyms the right bank of the Nizhny Novgorod Region (Kavley, Kudley, Motyzley, Seley, Tartaley, Shemley, Chuvakhley, etc.). The village name Kuzhadon in Dalnekonstantinov district can be explained by Erzya kužo, Mok. kuža "glade". The names having the root vele, vile descended from Erzya vele "village". The river Modan, rt of the Seryozha, rt of the Tesha, rt of the Oka from Erzya, Moksha moda "land".

Sketched a picture of the migration of Finno-Ugric peoples to contemporary habitats is well confirmed also by the location of the Finno-Ugric toponyms decrypted using only one of all the Finno-Ugric languages (see Google Map below).

Finno-Ugric place names on the ethno-producing areas and migration routes of the Finno-Ugric peoples.

The boundaries of total Finno-Ugric territory and boundaries of individual areas are indicated by black lines. At the same time they are the rivers, if they have no interpretation by means of the Finno-Ugric languages. Place-names left by individual Finno-Ugric peoples at times of formation of their primary languages are indicated by different colors. Finnish blue, Estonian red, Hungarian brown, moksha light-violet, Komi light-blue, Udmurt green, etc. Localities designated by starlets, rivers by lines.
There are on the map names of Bulgarian origin marked by yellow squares, left by creators of Fatyanovo culture, who came from the banks of the Dnieper along the Desna River and upper Oka River. Placement of names shows that the aliens did not mix with the local population for a long time and obviously forced them to migrate in search of new places of settlement.

Placing place names confirms to a certain extent the picture of settling primitive people, drawn by Morgan. As Finno-Ugric, and Bulgarish, and the Anglo-Saxon place names are characterized not only by clusters at a certain place, but slso by well-defined chains that mark the path of human settlement. Settlements in the chain are located, really, at a short distance from each other, what ensures close contact between the departed and the remaining population, which contributes to the conservation of a common language. The difference in language that arises in the process of resettlement, was talking about by Morgan, obviously refers to the earlier periods, when the tongue is still in its formative stages.

Another addition to the picture of Morgan. Not only relative overpopulation of certain areas, but also the invasion of foreign-language tribes drives the aboriginal population, if it is culturally inferior to the newcomers. In our case, an example would be the displacement Veps by new arrivals Bulgars, who stood at a higher level of development. Ways of migrations determined by natural conditions. On the map you can see that the Bulgars moved along the banks of the Desna and Oka Rivers and, having come so the territory of Veps and finding it easy to settle, stayed here for a long stay and did not penetrate into the area of the Finns. This is evidenced by the almost complete lack there of Bulgarish toponymy and fairly numerous Finnish names.

So, the first came into motion the Veps. Ways of their migrations can be marked by place name, what requires additional professional research. The presence of the toponym Viazma in the areas of Estonians and Sami (Lapps) gives reason assume that Vepsians moved to the northwest, and thus pushed to the migration of the Estonians and the Sami. The Finns had to stay on the old places certain time.

Sure, the certain psychological barrier was the passing of the Volga River to be considered as a border of the known populated world. But under pressure of neighbors, the ancient Finno-Ugric tribes, first of all Mansi, Khanty, Sami, searching for new places for hunting and fishing, passed this water barrier. Finding auspicious conditions, they continued the gradual movement on open spaces of the Northern-East Europe. The ethnic groups of Finno-Ugers moved, exact as other people during migration, in the order determined by the places of their former habitats, not out-distancing one another and especially not remaining behind. Staying more long time on the places with favorable conditions, some clans were separated from the language relatives, and the certain changes in their languages were arisen and this led to formation of new dialects. For example, the Karelian language could be arisen in such way on the area between the river Northern Dvina and the lake Onega. Small groups, which lagged behind a great bulk of a tribe, were assimilated by more numerous newcomers.

Judging from the scant demonstrative place names, Mordvinic tribes occupied the left bank of the Sula and the basin of the Psyol and Vorskla, ie north-western part of the Bondarikha culture. Such localization of Mordvinic settlements gives warrant to bind confidently known the Bilske settlement with the city of Gelonos described by Herodotus. This hypothesis has been long advanced by B. Shramko (SHRAMKO B. P. 1987), but V. Ilinski has proved its failure (IL'INSKAYA V.A., 1977: 91-92).

Left: Map of Bils'k hillfort according B. Shramko (SHRAMKO B.P. 1987: 24, Fig. 2.)

Number mark
1. Western fortification.
2. Eastern fortification.
3. Kuzemyn fortification.
Oriental ramparts run along steep banks of the Vorskla River, and Western ones- along the dry bed of the Sukha Hrunl River.

Herodotus asserted that the wooden city of Gelonos was located in the country of Budinoi and hillfort Bilske lies at the old channel of the Vorskla River opposite the town of Kotelva in Poltava Region.

The Budinoi are considered to be the forefathers of Mordvins. Therefore Mordvinic epic about the building of a large city ( MASKAYEV A.I., 1965: 298) confirms the made hypotheses. The Bondarikha culture, that existed in the interval 1200 800 years BC, is associated with its predecessor Maryanovka one, which relics are found on the Desna, Seym, Sula, Vorskla, Sev. Donets and Oskol (BEREZANSKAYA S.S., 1982: 41). There goes out between the Sula and Desna the Bondarikha culture beyond the border of Maryanovka one. It was here that the Lebedivka culture was located later, which bearers were defined as the Anglo-Saxon. Coming to the left bank of the Dnieper the Anglo-Saxon pushed the Mordvinic folk beyond the Sula, but may also assimilated its remnants, as reflected in the lexical correspondences between the English and the Mordvinic languages which can not be explained otherwise. Later, apparently, Mrdvins had to return to their ancestral lands and further to the territory of the present-day Mordovia

English, the word fang could evidence in favor of the contacts of the Anglo-Saxon with the Mordvins, because similar words meaning "tooth" are present also in the Finno-Ugric languages (Mansi puŋk, Khanty pöŋk, Hung fog, Lap pānnj, Udmurt, Komi pin'). In Mordvinic this word has the form pey, but it could sound different formerly, because the Talish language has word pingə "fang" which could be borrowed from Mordvinic (other Iranian languages have no similar word). However, it is believed that the meaning "fang" of the English word had evolved from OE fang "hunting, spil" which stayed semantically enough far. It is nterestingly that Old English had another word for "fang" of unknown origin. It may indicate the presence of the Anglo-Saxon in eastern Europe, because there is a group of words of different meaning but deriving from the Turkic čočqa "pig" Os tusk'a "a boar", Hung tuskó "stump" Moksha shochka, Erzya chochka "a log" which correspond to the OE tūsc "fang" (yet Ung tüske "thorn", Veps t'ähk, Fin tähkä "a spike").

A good argument in favor of Anglo-Mordvinic contacts is the correspondence of archaic Eng leman "a lover" and Mordvinic (Moksha and Erzya) loman "a man." At first sight, this is a distant relation, but it is not. There is in Ossetian the word lymän "a friend" semantically close to the English word, and this immediately changes the attitude to the correspondence. The relationship between the Ossetian and Mordvinic words was spoken yet by V. Abayev, but he believed that the word was borrowed in Mordvinic from the "Scythian" language. In fact, the origins of words to be found in OE el "alien" and mann "a man." The Morodvin word has correspondences in several Finno-Ugric languages having meaning "a man" or "a stranger" (Vep łaman, Lap olmenč, Mari ulmo, Moksha lomanen, Mansi elm), so of course it was borrowed from Old English, and then spread among other Finno-Ugric peoples. It may be noted that the semantic relationship of words "a friend" and "a stranger (man)" is understandable, because in ancient times there friendly relations always existed between members of different ethnic groups (kunaks). Subsequently the Anglo-Saxons borrowed from the ancestors of Ossetians the word lymän "friend" and redefined it as a "a lover".

Here are yet a few possible Anglo-Mordvinic matches:

OE ampre sorrel Mok, Erz umbrav sorrel;

OE glæs "glass" Mok klants "glass",

OE lætt "a lath" Mok lata, Erz lato "roof, fore-roof";

OE maser "maple" Mok maraz "Tatar maple",

OE pǽl, pala post, pole- Mok pal "a stake";

OE sot "soot" Mok, Erz sod "soot",

OE tōl "a tool" Mok tula, Erz tulo "a wedge".

Archaeological sites of the Magyars have been found in the Lower Kama land and Bashkirian Urals. We are that "Old-Hungarian tribes appeared in the Western Urals area no earlier than the turn of the 6-7th centuries and remained there until the thirties of the 9th century AD" (KHALIKOV A.Kh., 1985: 28). However, this does not imply that the Magyar Urheimat was somewhere in the Urals, as many believe, including the Hungarian scientists (VERES P. 1985).

This assumption can be true according to the Mordvins, but concerning to Hungarians there is an opinion, that they should live somewhere near-by the Urals at some time. Maybe, the opinion about the Ural Urheimat of Magyars has been formed on the warrant of obvious and far-reaching influence of Turkic languages on Hungarian at the conventional assumption, that the native land of Turks was somewhere on Altai. This assumption resulted notion about the Volga-Ural region of cultural and linguistic interaction of the Uralic and Altaic ethnoi (GARIPOV T.M., KUZYEV R.G., 1985). But, as we have seen, the Urheimat of Magyars was in Eastern Europe, their first contacts to Turkic speakers occurred just here, instead of nearly of the Urals. The existence of certain linguistic contacts between the Magyars and the Indo-Iranians going in the more distant past allow the possibility that the Hungarians could cross the Volga already at historical time. Specialists have long known the special Hungarian-Ossetian language connections, but more important for determination of the Magyar settlements are the connections of theHungarian language with Kurdish, Talyshi, and Gilaki. The most convincing examples of possible Hungarian-Iranian lexical correspondences are shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Hungarian-Iranian lexical correspondences.

Hungarian Kurdish
bitorol to usurp Kurd bîtir to get
csipö thigh Kurd çîp calf (a parf of leg)
csiriz shoe glue Kurd çirîsk glue
csirke chicken Kurd çêlîk nestling
dúc slanting supporting pole Kurd doş slope
épit to build Kurd ebinî construction
hó month Kurd hov month
lomb leaves Kurd lam leave
méreg poison Kurd merk poison, Osset. märg poison
száraz dry Kurd şorax dry
teher load Kurd texar weight
mezö field Tal. məzə field
nz to look Tal. nəzə to see
terel to drive Tal. təranən to drive, Osset. täryn to drive
vad wild Tal. vaz wild
rem horror Gil. rəm horror
rés chink Gil. rəxnə hole
veszte death Gil. vəsta to end

There are still a lot lexical correspondences between the Hungarian and other Iranian languages, but they have by the great deal the Ossetic parallels too, therefore they can prove the contacts of the ancient Magyars with the ancient Ossets at later times. The examples of matches resulted in the table between Hungarian and Kurdish, Talishi and Gilaki languages cannot go back to the historical times as Magyars could not have their habitats near to the other Iranian peoples, except for the Ossets, therefore they have to certify language contacts between Magyars and Iranian tribes when those still stayed in Eastern Europe.

We admit that ancestors of modern-day Mansi and Khanty went for the Volga under the pressure of Proto-Komi and Proto-Udmurts which all over again have occupied their former areas, and then went for the Volga too. According to this, Magyars should expand also their territory as a result of natural overpopulation. Obviously, they crossed the Don's displacing there Iranian inhabitants, though as usually it happens in such cases, some deal of them stayed on the native sites.

Free counter and web stats    

Please this page? Help us to develop this site!

1978 2018 V.Stetsyuk

Reprinting of articles from site are encouraged while
reference (hyperlink) to my site is provided

Site powered by

Load count : 10253

Modified : 17.06.2018

If you look up the type error
on this page, please select it
by mouse and press Ctrl+Enter.